USPTO serial 86622903
MULTISAFIRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTISAFIRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201-3360Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Orthodontic appliances and dental instruments, namely, facial arch wires and pre-shaped facial arch wires, NiTi (nickel titanium) wires, thermo-activated wires, grooved wires, lip wires and lip-active plates; orthodontic appliances and dental instruments, namely, dental wires, twist flex dental wires, orthodontic lingual bars, elastic hard dental wires, tie wire, soft wire and brass wire; orthodontic appliances and dental instruments, namely, elastic rings and separating rings, chain rings and rotator rings; dental accessories and auxiliary appliances, namely, lingual buttons, surgical hooks, ball clasps, palatal bars and quad helix expanders, clampers in the nature of clamps for surgical use, pins for artificial teeth, distalization appliances, namely, dental instruments for use in molar distalization, locking meshes and springs; dental and orthodontic appliances and instruments, namely, hard wires used in orthodontics and rings used in dentition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |