USPTO serial 86623436
SOFTNETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOFTNETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene Bolmarcich
GENE BOLMARCICH LAW OFFICES OF GENE BOLMARCICH215 STERLING DRNEWINGTON, CT 06111-2261UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Providing co-location services for voice, video and data communications applications; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the web site user to other local and global web pages; Rental of communication apparatus and implements; Satellite communication services; Telecommunication consultation in the nature of technical consulting in the field of audio, text and visual data transmission and communication; Telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; Telecommunications services, namely, wireless telephony and wireless broadband communications services for the transmission of voice and data; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Transmission of information through video communication systems; Video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network featuring the uploaded, posted and tagged videos of others; Wireless broadband communication services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Consulting in the field of IT project management; Information technology consulting services; Integration of computer systems and networks; IT integration services; Leasing of computers; Maintenance and upgrading of computer software; Monitoring the computer systems of others for technological purposes and providing backup computer programs and facilities; Planning, design and implementation of computer technologies for others; Preparation, update, installation and maintenance of computer software; Remote computer backup services; Web publishing, namely, creating a website and uploading it onto an Internet server; Web site design; Web site design consultancy; Web site development for others; Web site hosting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |