USPTO serial 86624182
SOMA NOURISHMENT FOR ALL MANKIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOMA NOURISHMENT FOR ALL MANKIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Meaney
JOSEPH R. MEANEY Venjuris P C1938 E Osborn RdPhoenix, AZ 85016-7234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen poultry, namely, grilled or breaded breasts, tenders, strips and nuggets; Frozen and/or refrigerated prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry and/or vegetables; Frozen and/or refrigerated prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta, rice and/or grains; Frozen prepared snacks consisting primarily of meat, fish, seafood, poultry, or vegetables; Frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, vegetables, and cheese, namely, meat patties, vegetable-based patties; Refrigerated meats, namely, turkey, chicken, beef, and pork; Prepared ground turkey burger-style patties; Prepared vegetable burger-style patties; Vegetable food products, namely, vegetable-based meat and egg substitutes; frozen prepackaged entrees consisting of vegetable-based food products, namely, vegetable patties and vegetable based side items; textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; frozen packaged entrees consisting of vegetable-based patties; Prepared salad kit consisting of vegetable salad and salad dressing; Pre-washed vegetable and fruit salads; vegetable salads consisting of specialty lettuce, namely, Romaine, Kale, Spinach and fresh vegetables and salad dressing; pre-mixed vegetable salad consisting primarily of cut vegetables; Prepared salad kits consisting primarily of processed lettuce and salad dressing, and one or more of the following items; vegetables, fruit, nuts, eggs, cheese, meat, poultry, croutons, tortilla chips, and flat bread chips; packaged vegetable salads; packaged cut fruit; packaged cut fruit with dips; packaged cut vegetables; packaged cut vegetables with dips; packaged meals consisting of meat and one or more of eggs, fruits, and vegetables; soups; prepared food kits consisting of soups and salads; Prepared salad kits not consisting of lettuce or mixed greens, and consisting of salad dressing and one or more of the following items; chicken, beef, black beans, corn, cheese, tortilla strips, pickled onion, red pepper, croutons, edamame, peanuts, coconut, bacon, walnuts, dry salami, pepperoni, olives, roasted red pepper, dried cranberries, dried cherries, crispy onions, sunflower seeds and salad dressing; Refrigerated deli meats and processed meats, namely, turkey, chicken, beef, and pork; Cheeses, namely, whole, sliced, shredded and snack-style natural cheeses; Processed cheeses; Cheese spreads; Cheese foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bakery products, namely, multi-grain breads, bagels, English muffins, rolls and buns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Next Phase Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Next Phase Enterprises, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SOMA NOURISHMENT FOR ALL MANKIND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |