USPTO serial 86624716
ONYX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONYX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj Abhyanker
Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software that enables users to share and collaboratively develop software, computer code and user-generated content; Computer software, namely, software development tools; Downloadable computer software for use in the design, development, testing, and engineering of computer software; computer software for tracking changes and modifications to software and for managing software development projects; computer software for prioritizing, assigning, tracking, reporting and auditing issues relating to business information technology, measuring computer code coverage, creating and sharing electronic pages, documents and rich content with other users; Computer software for assisting in the development and testing of computer software applications and manuals sold therewith; Computer software for creating, managing and publishing software system requirements; Computer software that enables the user to compare, synchronize and merge local file system changes with remote file system changes; Computer software to create test cases, create software performance requirements and quality compliance reports; Downloadable cloud computer software for use in the design, development, testing, and engineering of computer software; Downloadable cloud computer software that enables users to share and collaboratively develop software, computer code and user-generated content; Downloadable cloud computer software, namely, software development tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy services in the field of software as a service; Providing information and consultancy services in the fields of design and development of computer software, computer software system design and analysis and data hosting services, including by electronic means via a global computer network; Providing information in the field of computer software design, development, testing, performance enhancement and engineering by means of communications networks; Providing databases featuring information in the field of computer software design, development, testing, performance enhancement and engineering; Technical consulting and support services, namely, troubleshooting of software problems rendered by telephone, e-mail, and by means of communications networks; Computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining an on-line web site for others to utilize real-timed shared resources for project management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that enables users to share and collaboratively develop software, computer code and user-generated content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software, namely, software development tools; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the design, development, testing, and engineering of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking changes and modifications to software and for managing software development projects; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for prioritizing, assigning, tracking, reporting and auditing issues relating to business information technology, measuring computer code coverage, creating and sharing electronic pages, documents and rich content with other users; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for assisting in the development and testing of computer software applications and manuals sold therewith; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, managing and publishing software system requirements; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that enables the user to compare, synchronize and merge local file system changes with remote file system changes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software to create test cases, create software performance requirements and quality compliance reports; Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for the purpose of managing software source code repositories and local file systems; Consulting services in the field of software development, software configuration management, and software project and release management; Cloud computing featuring software for use managing software development artifacts namely, source-code, design documentation, uml diagrams, software development planning schedules and human resources, and the storage of these artifacts; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software managing software development artifacts namely, source-code, design documentation, uml diagrams, software development planning schedules and human resources, and the storage of these artifacts; Computer services, namely, cloud source code repository hosting provider services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 5, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |