USPTO serial 86626396
STEER SMARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEER SMARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn A. Gromlovits
KATHRYN A. GROMLOVITS Shumaker Loop & Kendrick LLP101 South Tryon StreetSuite 2200Charlotte, NC 28280Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automobile parts, namely, ride control components and devices sold separately, namely, steering electronic control modules, steering torque sensors, steering angular position sensors, suspension electronic control modules, suspension position sensors and steering attenuators | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobile parts, namely, steering and suspension components and devices in the nature of tie rods, inner tie rod ends, outer tie rod ends, drag links, centerlinks, relay rods, sleeve adjusters, steering dampers, bushings attaching bracketry, control arms, track bars, panhard rods, radius rods, pitman arms, idler arms, seals, springs, steering gears, steering intermediate shafts, suspension ball joints, suspension assemblies, steering linkage assemblies, suspension toe links, tow hooks, shock absorbers, struts, springs, power steering pumps, power steering hoses, power steering valves, steering racks, steering pinions, steering shafts, steering boots, steering bellows, steering universal joints, suspension universal joints, driveline universal joints, axle spindles, stabilizer bars, stabilizer bar links, steering stabilizers, torsion bars, suspension trailing arms, suspension isolators, steering isolators, jounce bumpers, four wheel steering systems, watts links, dedion type suspensions, active suspension systems, semi-active suspension systems, swing arm suspensions, bell cranks, anti-roll bar, anti-sway bar, frequency dampers, spherical joints, hotchkiss suspensions, track rods, ladder bars, steering knuckles, steering arms, and haltenberger steering linkages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |