Drawing for REEF SAFE

USPTO serial 86626439

REEF SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REEF SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Schwartz

ROBERT M. SCHWARTZ Robert M Schwartz P APO Box 221470Hollywood, FL 33022-1470UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003After sun creams; After-sun gels; After-sun lotions; After-sun oils; Lip balm; Non-medicated sun care preparations; Skin moisturizer; Sun block preparations; Sun-tanning preparationsACTIVEMar 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 2, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 2015LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Oct 7, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 15, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance