Drawing for LUCHA LOCO

USPTO serial 86628827

LUCHA LOCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUCHA LOCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon Lee

JON LEE Lee Goodwin Lee Lewis & Dobson1300 E 9th St Ste 1Edmond, OK 73034-5760UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Baseball caps and hats; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirtsACTIVE—
043Restaurant services featuring tacos and tequila; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant, bar and catering servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 21, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 20, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2015RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Aug 25, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 16, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance