Drawing for CURBSIDE EXPRESS

USPTO serial 86629210

CURBSIDE EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CURBSIDE EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack

DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT ST FL 44PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-2713UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail and online grocery store services featuring home deliveryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 18, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 18, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 6, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 26, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 26, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 26, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 26, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance