Drawing for CLEAN & SIMPLE

USPTO serial 86629436

CLEAN & SIMPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAN & SIMPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

STEPHEN L. BAKER Baker and Rannells Pa92 E Main St., Suite 302Somerville, NJ 08876UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Bean dip; Chili; Chowder; Cooked fruits and vegetables; Dried meat; Frozen pre-packaged entrees consisting primarily of seafood; Gumbo; Meat; Meat, fish, fruit and vegetable jellies; Meat, fruit and vegetable jellies, jams, eggs; Meat-based snack foods; Pre-packaged dinners consisting of primarily of meat, seafood or poultry served with pasta, rice, fruits and vegetables; Prepared and prepackaged meals and entrees consisting primarily of egg with one or more of meat, fish, poultry, vegetable, cheese or onion; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of seafood; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, soups, fruit salads and vegetable salads; Preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; Processed eggs; Processed fish; Processed seafood, namely, fish; Soups; prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 27, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 10, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 14, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 21, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance