USPTO serial 86629533
S SYSTECH ONLY ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5129726Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2017
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with S SYSTECH ONLY ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa S. Dillenbeck
MELISSA S. DILLENBECK Drinker Biddle & Reath Llp191 N Wacker Dr Ste 3700Chicago, IL 60606-1615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, namely, a platform that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; software for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; software for database management in the fields of the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; computer programs, namely, software for generating, processing, storing and comparing anti-counterfeit attributes from marked features in a supply chain operation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Data management services for use in supply chain operation serialization | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Customizing computer components, namely, computer hardware used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; customizing computer hardware for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; customizing computer hardware used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Customizing computer software used in manufacturing for packaging and optimizing line performance that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used in manufacturing for packaging; customizing computer software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; customizing computer software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; customizing computer software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; customizing computer software used for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; customizing of computer software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; computer software consultation for software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; computer software consultation for software used for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; computer software consultation for software used for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; computer software consultation for software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and software that combines vision inspection and line and plant management software used to manufacture packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and software for managing machine vision inspection applications used in manufacturing packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and software for optimizing packaging line performance by facilitating the serialization of products using standard and non-standard codes, and for collecting performance metrics and data in connection with the manufacture of packaging; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and software used in connection with the manufacture of packaging that aggregates performance metrics and key performance indicators across multiple packaging lines and enables serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for an entire packaging operation; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for project and program management in the field of serialization of products using standard and nonstandard codes for a supply chain operation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sys-Tech Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named S SYSTECH ONLY ONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |