Drawing for REBEL BUDDHA

USPTO serial 86629538

REBEL BUDDHA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REBEL BUDDHA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth L. Kunkle

ELIZABETH L. KUNKLE Neal & McDevitt Llc1776 Ash StNorthfield, IL 60093-3001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, waters and juices in the nature of fruit, vegetable, herbal, and coconut juices, and alcoholic beverages, namely, beersACTIVE
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, hard cidersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 3, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 3, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 12, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 31, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 31, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 31, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 28, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 14, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 11, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 11, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 2, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 21, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 18, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance