Drawing for VERTEC

USPTO serial 86629950

VERTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PHILLIPS, WENDELL SHARMAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence H. Meier, Esquire

LAWRENCE H. MEIER, ESQUIRE DOWNS RACHLIN & MARTIN199 MAIN ST STE 600BURLINGTON, VT 05401-8339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Image acquisition and post production equipment for motion pictures, television and internet videos, namely, cameras, camera lenses, audio and video recorders, mechanical bracketry for cameras, wireless transmitters, wireless receivers, viewfinders, computer software and hardware for processing digital video images, and digital storage devices in the nature of solid state drivesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2016MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2016ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 7, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 1, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 1, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance