Drawing for FRACTORY

USPTO serial 86630507

FRACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, AHSEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Whittle

Jeffrey S. Whittle Hogan Lovells US LLP700 Louisiana Street, Suite 4300Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Commercial waste containers of metal; Containers of metal for transport; General purpose metal storage containersACTIVE—
020Packaging containers of plastic; Packaging containers of plastic for transport, for oil and gas industry use, for construction use, and for environmental remediation use; Plastic storage containers for commercial or industrial useACTIVE—
035Advertising and marketingACTIVE—
039Cargo container rental services; Leasing of fixed and movable storage containers to commercial and residential users; Product container consolidation for transportation purposes; Rental of storage containers; Supply chain logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others by air, rail, ship or truck; Transport and storage of goodsACTIVE—
040Manufacturing services for others in the field of metal containers and plastic containersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 27, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
May 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 18, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance