USPTO serial 86632301
EVERYDAY CALIFORNIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERYDAY CALIFORNIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edmund J. Ferdinand, III
EDMUND J. FERDINAND, III Ferdinand IP LLC1221 Post Road East, Suite 302Westport, CT 06880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins, mineral supplements, dietary supplements, and nutritional supplements, disposable baby diapers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Everyday California Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Everyday California Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EVERYDAY CALIFORNIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2017 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |