Drawing for OXI-KING

USPTO serial 86633151

OXI-KING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5101189Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2016
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with OXI-KING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Courtney Thompson

Courtney Thompson Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Industrial water sanitizer contained in cartridges and dispensers, namely, algaecides and bactericides used for killing algal, bacterial, and fungal slimes including in industrial recirculating and once-through industrial cooling systemsACTIVEApr 29, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2022NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2022C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 5, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2022E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2021REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 10, 2016SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2016CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 25, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 22, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 14, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 13, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 13, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2015ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance