Drawing for HARMLESS HAM

USPTO serial 86634849

HARMLESS HAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARMLESS HAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kristin DeMaria

KRISTIN DEMARIA Hudson & Martin490 Calle PrincipalMonterey, CA 93940-2775UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat substitutesABANDONED—
030Sandwiches, namely, plant based meat substitute for breakfastABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2017MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 2017ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 19, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 24, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 19, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 9, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 22, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance