Drawing for DYNACUT

USPTO serial 86635079

DYNACUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DYNACUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Liss

MARK J. LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007mining equipment, namely parts and accessories for hard rock continuous miners that use oscillating disc technology, namely, oscillating discs and assembly partsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 12, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 23, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 21, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 21, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 21, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 23, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 18, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 22, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance