USPTO serial 86636337
PICK ME UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICK ME UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest B. Lipscomb, III
ERNEST B LIPSCOMB III BARNWELL WHALEYPO DRAWER HCHARLESTON, SC 33137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Bodyshaping undergarment clothing worn over the buttock that lifts the buttocks without padding | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |