USPTO serial 86636761
#LOVEUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHUPATHI, TARA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with #LOVEUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JOHNJAY AND RICH LOVEUP FOUNDATION
PHOENIX, AZ
Other trademarks owned by JOHNJAY AND RICH LOVEUP FOUNDATION
Johnjay and Rich Care for Kids Foundation
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Johnjay and Rich Care for Kids Foundation
Johnjay and Rich Care for Kids Foundation
Phoenix, AZ
Other trademarks owned by Johnjay and Rich Care for Kids Foundation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley P. Hartman
BRADLEY P. HARTMAN HARTMAN TITUS PLC3507 N. CENTRAL AVE.SUITE 101PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2121Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHNJAY AND RICH LOVEUP FOUNDATION
- Other trademarks owned by Johnjay and Rich Care for Kids Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Johnjay and Rich Care for Kids Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named #LOVEUP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2019 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 1, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |