Drawing for DEER CREEK

USPTO serial 86637868

DEER CREEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DEER CREEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Roberts

John Roberts Roberts IP Law6545 S Fort Apache Rd, Ste 135, # 102Las Vegas, NV 89148-6758UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BeerABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 4, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 6, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 6, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 16, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 16, 2015OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 13, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 23, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance