Drawing for ISO FINISHING

USPTO serial 86638250

ISO FINISHING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISO FINISHING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Z. Peter Sawicki

Z. PETER SAWICKI Westman Champlin & Koehler P A900 2nd Ave S Ste 1400Minneapolis, MN 55402-3244UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Surface treatment equipment, namely, machines utilizing rotational motion for high energy surface finishing and material treatment in the nature of tumblers, vibratory grinding machines, and centrifuges; vibratory and tumbling medias for use in tumblers, vibratory grinding machines, and centrifuges; cleaning compounds, burnishing compounds, polishing compounds, rust inhibiting compounds, degreasing compounds, and flocculation compounds for use in tumblers, vibratory grinding machines, and centrifugesACTIVEApr 21, 2014
040Material treatment services, namely, finishing the surfaces of materials, namely, surface treatment of metals, plastics and ceramicsACTIVEApr 21, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2016MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 27, 2016ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 26, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance