Drawing for SUEÑOS ENFRENTADOS

USPTO serial 86639005

SUEÑOS ENFRENTADOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUEÑOS ENFRENTADOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Veronica Scardina

Veronica Scardina Law Office of Angel Leal Jr. PA8700 West Flagler St Suite 180Miami, FL 33174UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going reality based television program; Entertainment services in the nature of an ongoing IPTV (Internet Protocol Television), television programming segments in the field of positive psychology, personal relationships, the art and science of happiness; Entertainment services, namely, an on-going series featuring inspirational, reality-based game show provided through Television, Internet, Cable, Satellite, RadioACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 24, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
May 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance