USPTO serial 86639331
ECOPEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOPEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allison Strickland Ricketts
ALLISON STRICKLAND RICKETTS Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu P C866 United Nations PlzNew York, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Horticultural mixture of peat moss, wooden sticks, and strands of fibers to promote healthy plant growth | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |