Drawing for BIOBOTS

USPTO serial 86639691

BIOBOTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOBOTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole K. McLaughlin

NICOLE K. MCLAUGHLIN Duane Morris Llp30 S 17th St Fl 5Philadelphia, PA 19103-4196UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Biologically compatible polymers, namely, hydrogels used to manufacture polymeric networks used in the manufacture of engineered living tissue for medical and scientific purposes for medical, scientific and non-scientific purposesACTIVE—
007Machines for manufacturing three dimensional (3D) engineered living tissues, namely, 3D printers; machines, namely, three dimensional (3D) printer for the printing of engineered living tissuesACTIVESep 8, 2014
009Laboratory apparatus for fabrication of three dimensional (3D) engineered living tissues; downloadable operating software to control laboratory apparatus for fabrication of three dimensional (3D) engineered living tissuesACTIVESep 8, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 12, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 11, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 11, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 6, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 3, 2016GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 2015LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
May 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 26, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance