USPTO serial 86641799
CURIOUSTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOO, JEANE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CURIOUSTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fidel D Nwamu
FIDEL D NWAMU Nwamupc Patents Trademark360 Grand Ave # 109Oakland, CA 94610-4840UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for streaming and accessing audio-visual content, namely, lessons and courses comprising of quizzes and tips, wherein the streaming and accessing of audio-visual content is via a global communication network; Computer software for continuous streaming of audio-visual content via Internet and global communication networks; Computer software for streaming and accessing audio-visual content via a variety of channels, namely, Biz, Music, Tech, Photo, Craft, Life, Code, Health, Brainy and Food channels; Computer software for distributing and accessing audio-visual content via third-party provider platforms; Computer software for streaming audio-visual content via a variety of channels, namely, Biz, Music, Tech, Photo, Craft, Life, Code, Health, Brainy and Food channels | ACTIVE | May 15, 2015 |
| 038 | Streaming and transmission of audiovisual content via the Internet and global communication networks | ACTIVE | May 15, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |