USPTO serial 86642223
GOLDEN GUJARAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLDEN GUJARAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Soula Skokos
SOULA SKOKOS Skokos Law Group Llc1100 Jorie Blvd Ste 220Oak Brook, IL 60523-4421UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Indian nut-based snack foods; fried lentil mixes; fried lentil based snack foods; nut-based snack foods; low calorie savory Indian nut based snack foods; low calorie Indian nut based snack foods; processed nuts; spicy peanuts; hot spicy flavored peanuts; spicy peanuts flavored with masala spices; processed green gram beans; mini fig and date roll consisting of dried fruits, nuts, and spices; banana chips; salty banana chips; saffron mango pulp; peanut based snack foods; dried Colocasia leaf based snack foods; low calorie savory Indian nut based snack foods; low calorie Indian nut based snack foods; fried chickpeas; banana wafers; spicy banana wafers; sweet banana wafers | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Rice-based snack foods; jaggery; gram flour chips and flour crisps; spicy gram flour fried noodles; spicy gram flour fried snack food; puffed rice snacks; spicy gram flour based snack foods; fried corn flakes; multigrain-based snack foods; baked pastries with savory filling; crunchy thick noodles; fenugreek flavored crunchy noodles; fried flour crisps; spicy fried thick noodles; low calorie savory Indian multigrain-based snack foods; low calorie Indian multigrain-based snack foods; spicy corn mixes; mix of rice flakes and fried flour crisps; savory rice based snack mixes; savory rice based snack food; spices; puffed rice; snack mix consisting primarily of puffed rice and spices and also containing dried fruit, nuts and lemon; fried flour strands in the nature of chips; extra thin fried flour strands in the nature of chips; spicy extra thin fried flour strands in the nature of chips; flour balls filled with bean stuffing with spices; mini bread rolls; cumin chips; fenugreek chips; chickpea flour noodles mixed with spices; crispy flat bread chips; roasted rice flakes; fried rice flakes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Everest Traders, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Everest Traders, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GOLDEN GUJARAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |