USPTO serial 86643300
JUICEBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2016
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with JUICEBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Carlos, CA
San Carlos, CA
San Carlos, CA
BOSTON, MA
BOSTON, MA
ROME, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vic Lin
Vic Lin Innovation Capital Law Group, LLP19800 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 280Irvine, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric vehicle charging systems comprised of charging stations for charging electric vehicles and computer systems for remote observation, management and operation of charging stations for charging electric vehicles; electrical apparatus, namely, charging stations for charging electric vehicles and other equipment for charging and control of electric vehicles, namely, battery chargers, electric cables, power cables, electrical adapters, power adapters, electrical plugs, electrical outlets, electrical plug holders, mounting brackets adapted for electric vehicle charging stations, covers for electrical outlets; [ computer software programs, namely, Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) for developing software for operating charging stations for the charging of electric vehicles and other electric loads and related generating systems ] | ACTIVE | Jun 24, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Electric Motor Werks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Electric Motor Werks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Electric Motor Werks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ENEL X WAY USA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ENEL X NORTH AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENEL X S.R.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named JUICEBOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 11, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |