USPTO serial 86643513
VITAGUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DANIELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITAGUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Kirshner
DANIEL KIRSHNER DANIEL S KIRSHNER ATTORNEY AT LAW LLC199 ROUTE 18EAST BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816-1413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chewing gum containing dietary supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |