Drawing for 1869 ERNEST AMORY CODMAN 1940 · THE · CODMAN SHOULDER SOCIETY THE END RESULT

USPTO serial 86643710

1869 ERNEST AMORY CODMAN 1940 · THE · CODMAN SHOULDER SOCIETY THE END RESULT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1869 ERNEST AMORY CODMAN 1940 · THE · CODMAN SHOULDER SOCIETY THE END RESULT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay M. Pabian

JAY M. PABIAN Pabian & Russell Llc1 International PlBoston, MA 02110-2602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Providing medical information in the field of shoulder surgery; providing an on-line searchable database in the medical field related to shoulder surgeryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 16, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 19, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 16, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 16, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 9, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance