USPTO serial 86644515
ASEPTIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DONALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASEPTIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Danielle I. Mattessich
DANIELLE I. MATTESSICH Merchant & Gould P CPO Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | NUTRACEUTICALS FOR USE AS A DIETARY SUPPLEMENT; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR TREATING GASTRO-INTESTINAL DISEASES AND POST-OPERATIVE CARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | MICROWAVE ASSISTED THERMAL PROCESSING SYSTEM USED FOR RAPID STERILIZATION OF FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN THE STERILIZATION OF LIQUIDS, GASES AND SOLIDS USED IN THE FOOD AND BEVERAGE INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | PROCESSED FOODS, NAMELY, PROCESSED FRUITS, PROCESSED VEGETABLES, BROTHS, SOUPS, AND DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | SALSA, SAUCES, GRAVY; READY TO EAT (RTE) FOODS, SHELF STABLE FOODS AND FUNCTIONAL FOODS, NAMELY, SOUP, MASHED POTATOES, HUMMUS, AND REFRIED BEANS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SMOOTHIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | (Based on Use in Commerce) DESIGN AND TESTING FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; TESTING, ANALYSIS, AND EVALUATION OF THE GOODS OF OTHERS TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS; ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ASEPTIC FOOD MANUFACTURING; PROVIDING TECHNOLOGY FOR FOOD PROCESSING, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNOLOGY FOR THE ADVANCED THERMAL PROCESSING OF FOODS IN THE NATURE OF CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF FOOD PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY IN THE FIELD OF THE ADVANCED THERMAL PROCESSING OF FOODS; CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF FOOD PROCESSING AND FOOD TREATMENT MACHINES AND APPARATUS (Based on Intent to Use)STERILIZATION SERVICES IN FIELD OF ASEPTIC FOOD MANUFACTURING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aseptia, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ASEPTIA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |