USPTO serial 86646863
CLINICARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLINICARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francesco Braga
Francesco Braga PERANI & PARTNERS S.P.A.Piazza Armando Diaz 7MILANO,ITALYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |