USPTO serial 86647224
CONTACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DANIELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONTACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory D. Latham
GREGORY D. LATHAM Intellectual Property Consulting Llc334 Carondelet Street, Suite BNew Orleans, LA 70130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | Gear and equipment used to hold, carry, or secure firearms, ammunition, and gun cartridges to an individual or any mode of transport, namely, ammunition carriers, belts in the nature of gun belts, gun cartridge belts, ammunition belts, shot gun shell belts, ammunition magazine belts, and all in one belts that hold guns, gun cartridges, ammunition, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines, pouches specially adapted for holding ammunition, gun cartridges, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines, bags specially adapted for holding ammunition, gun cartridges, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines, harnesses specially adapted for carrying guns, holsters, pouches and bags adapted to hold gun cartridges, ammunition, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines, chest rigs specially adapted for carrying guns, holsters, pouches and bags adapted to hold gun cartridges, ammunition, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines, leg rigs specially adapted for carrying guns, holsters, pouches and bags adapted to hold gun cartridges, ammunition, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines, modular carry systems in the nature of modular holster mounts and modular pouches adapted to hold gun cartridges, ammunition, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines, carrying cases for equipment and accessories used by public safety and military personnel specifically adapted for holding guns, holsters, pouches and bags adapted to hold gun cartridges, ammunition, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines, and load bearing vests and rigs adapted for concealed carry of firearms and firearm accessories in the nature of holsters, ammunition, gun cartridges, shot gun shells, and ammunition magazines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |