Drawing for T0 TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 86647535

T0 TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with T0 TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Glen Nickle

E. GLEN NICKLE Medici, Inc.799 W. Coliseum WayMidvale, UT 84047UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and hardware for financial transactions, namely, for trading digital stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, or other assets or liabilities using distributed and cryptographic techniquesACTIVEApr 24, 2019
036Financial services, namely, assisting others with the completion of financial transactions for stocks, bonds, securities and equitiesACTIVEApr 24, 2019
042Providing online, non-downloadable software for financial transactions, namely, for trading digital stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, or other assets or liabilities using distributed and cryptographic techniquesACTIVEApr 24, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 25, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 25, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 27, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 22, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 22, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 23, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 25, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 25, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2015GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2015GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2015EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Jul 24, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance