USPTO serial 86649582
XTREME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XTREME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Fraser
JENNIFER FRASER DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1301 K Street, NWSuite 1100 WestWashington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | nonmetal and non-paper containers for storage or transport; non-metal and non-paper closures for containers; furniture, namely, display units, sales and display counters; furniture for house, office, garden, motor homes, camping and vessels; furniture made of leather or wood; furniture primarily of metal, namely, mirrors, bed frames, dining tables, coffee tables, end tables, desks, display cases, shelving, dog gates, and baby gates; free-standing panel units for exhibitions, displays and partitioning; display cases for merchandise; nonmetal holders for signs, key holders and candles; cushions; doors for furniture; fitted furniture covers not of fabric; furniture, namely, wall units; pet furniture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |