USPTO serial 86649948
SUREMEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUREMEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Pham
CHRISTOPHER M PHAM CHRISTOPHER M PHAM LAW GROUP PLLC10700 RICHMOND AVE STE 200HOUSTON, TX 77042-4900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Liquid and powder protein based dietary and nutritional supplement and meal replacement shakes for the purpose of strengthening the immune system | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |