USPTO serial 86650670
BELLALIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BELLALIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie Webb Olson
Carrie Webb Olson Day Pitney LLPOne International Place, 17th FloorBoston, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Household appliances and equipment, namely, electric air deodorizers, air filters for household purposes, air purifiers for household purposes, apparatus for dehydrating food waste, apparatus for filtering drinking water, apparatus for purifying tap water, ice dispensing machines, beverage cooling apparatus, electric beverage heaters, electric blankets for household purposes, electric coffee urns, cooking rings, decorative tabletop water fountains, drinking fountains, electric egg boilers, electric air deodorizing apparatus, electric ice-cream makers, electric appliances for making yogurt, electric apparatus for dehydrating foodstuffs, electric broilers, electric dispensers for room deodorants, electric food warmers, electric hot plates, electric hot water bottles, electric plate warmers, electric rotisseries, electric tea making apparatus, electric towel warmers, electric woks, faucet filters, faucet sprayers, gas-powered griddles for cooking food, grill lighters, electric heating cushions not for medical purposes, electric heating pads not for medical purposes, hot plates for household purposes, ice cube making machines, ice making machines, lighters for grills, multicookers, stoves, electric panini makers, electric grills, electric griddles, sandwich makers, electric waffle makers, buffet servers, coffee makers, party hot trays, electric donut makers, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens, electric espresso machines, frozen dessert dispensers, food dehydrators, bread making machines, electric cupcake makers, electric cone makers, electric rice steamers, indoor grills, indoor grill accessories, namely, warming trays, electric kettles, electric deep fryers, electric pasta makers, electric bread-making machines, convection ovens, electric slow cookers, electric cookware, namely, electric boilers and roasters, microwave ovens, cotton candy making machines, electric popcorn popping machines, plate warmers, portable gas burners, portable stoves, refrigerating cabinets and machines, rotisseries, water coolers, water filters, water filtration and purification apparatus, water heaters for household purposes, water purifiers for household purposes, electric hot dog cookers and warmers featuring wheels, refrigerators, domestic cooking ovens, electric popcorn makers, electric food steamers, electric hot dog steamers, electric pretzel makers, electric corn dog makers, electric frozen confectionery makers, pizza warmers in the nature of electric food warmers, electric pressure cookers, electric tortilla warmers, electric egg cookers, electric wine coolers, refrigerated beer dispensers, electric quesadilla makers, beverage making electrical appliances, electric dip warmers, electric chocolate fountains, electric hot dog rollers, electric hot dog roasters, electric skillets, electric toast and brew breakfast stations consisting of electric toasters and coffee makers, electric roasters, electric pie makers, electric pizza ovens, electric raclette grills, electric appliance for making yoghurt, electric water coolers, electric water dispensers, ice cream makers, electric coffee percolators, electric table stoves, sorbet makers, electric frying pans, electric countertop dessert bakers, electric whoopee pie makers, electric brownie makers, electric cookie makers, electric rice cookers, electric fondue sets, namely, fondue pots, burners, forks, bowls and candles sold as a unit, electric candy making machines, electric chocolate warmers, electric smores makers, electric stew makers, electric hot air cookers, electric fryers, electric fryer ovens, electric oil-less fryers, electric crepe makers, electric induction cookers, electric portable cooking ranges, electric pastry makers, beer keg refrigerators, compact temperature controlled wine cellars, electric food smokers, electric burger makers, electric tortilla shell makers, electric breakfast sandwich makers, compact convection cookers, electric breakfast stations comprised of electric toasters and coffee makers, electric bun warmers, electric hot cake makers, electric cake makers, electric cake pop makers, compact halogen cookers and electric party grills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 29, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |