USPTO serial 86651119
Serial No. 86651119
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 86651119?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shabnam Malek
SHABNAM MALEK Brand & Branch LLP1714 Franklin Street No. 100-336Oakland, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in discussions, get feedback from their peers, from virtual communities, and engage in social networking in the field of medical marijuana | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |