USPTO serial 86651191
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dustin Mauck
Dustin Mauck RegitzMauck PLLC1700 Pacific AvenueSuite 2610Dallas, TX 75201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing secure, private, scalable, multiple user network interconnectivity to the cloud computing solutions on the Internet, in the nature of infrastructure as a service (IAAS), software as a service (SAAS), and platform as a service (PAAS) utilizing internet protocol, virtual private network services and multiprotocol label switching (MPLS); Telecommunications gateway services, namely, providing gateway links to connect enterprise networks to cloud-based applications; providing third party users with access to Internet-based cloud services; telecommunication services, namely, providing providing multiple user network interconnectivity and multiple user internet connectivity for use in designing, developing, providing, and managing cloud computing solutions, namely, infrastructure as a service (IAAS), software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), desktop as a service (DAAS), cloud-hosted e-mail services, and cloud-based network and information security monitoring services; providing cloud-hosting email services; communications services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images, messages and data by telecommunications networks, mobile communications networks, wireless communications networks, the internet, information services networks, and data networks; providing multiple user access to global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; communications services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images, messages and data by telecommunications networks, mobile communications networks, wireless communications networks, the internet, information services networks, and data networks; telecommunication services, namely, providing multiple-user access to the internet, virtual private networks, and remote networks via dial-up, broadband high speed dsl, t1, multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) and wireless networking; software for developing, managing and operating cloud-based e-commerce solutions in software as a service (SAAS), platform as a services (PAAS) and/or infrastructure as a service (IAAS) environments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services, integration of private and public cloud computing environments, and consulting in the field of cloud computing; cloud computing services, namely, designing, developing, maintaining, and managing cloud computing systems, namely, infrastructure as a service (IAAS), software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), desktop as a service (DAAS), cloud-hosted e-mail services, and cloud-based network and information security monitoring services: computer services, namely, providing, infrastructure as a service (IAAS), software as a service (SAAS), platform as a service (PAAS), desktop as a service (DAAS), all featuring software that enables users to upload, store and retrieve data documents from cloud computing environments in software as a service (SAAS), platform as a services (PAAS) and/or infrastructure as a service (IAAS) environments; providing temporary use of nondownloadable software for developing, managing and operating cloud-based e-commerce solutions in software as a service (SAAS), platform as a services (PAAS) and/or infrastructure as a service (IAAS) environments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |