Drawing for INTEGRITY ONE

USPTO serial 86651705

INTEGRITY ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CUCCIAS, MATTHEW JAMES
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTEGRITY ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nathan P. Suedmeyer

NATHAN P SUEDMEYER LARSON & LARSON P A11199 69TH STLARGO, FL 33773-5504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for insurance processing, namely, software for processing non-standard automobile insurance covering and for providing transactions, namely, policy quotes, policy binding, policy renewal, bodily injury liability, property damage liability, personal injury protection, medical payments, uninsured motorists, comprehensive loss, collision loss, loss of use, custom and additional equipment, accidental death, policy endorsement, policy payment transaction, claims acceptance, claims management, claims reporting, business analytics and reporting, and financial reportingABANDONEDApr 30, 2014
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for insurance processing, namely, software for processing non-standard automobile insurance covering and for providing transactions, namely, policy quotes, policy binding, policy renewal, bodily injury liability, property damage liability, personal injury protection, medical payments, uninsured motorists, comprehensive loss, collision loss, loss of use, custom and additional equipment, accidental death, policy endorsement, policy payment transaction, claims acceptance, claims management, claims reporting, business analytics and reporting, and financial reportingABANDONEDApr 30, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 5, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 5, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 5, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 22, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 21, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2016LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 24, 2016LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Feb 23, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance