Drawing for BATTERYQ

USPTO serial 86651740

BATTERYQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BATTERYQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

JOHN H. WEBER Baker & Hostetler1050 Connecticut Ave NW Ste 1100Washington, DC 20036-5318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable mobile application for use in battery monitoring, diagnostics, safety, and for education relating to battery technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2018DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 23, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jul 27, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 6, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 28, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance