USPTO serial 86652079
ENOVA BUSINESS SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATT, JAIME L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENOVA BUSINESS SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Zender
PHILIP R ZENDER SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP275 BATTERY ST STE 2600SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial consulting services, namely, advising others regarding their credit operations and collections activities; Financial credit modeling, namely, the evaluation of credit and other personal data as credit risk predictors; Business credit verification services; Credit scoring services; Loan servicing, namely, providing consumer credit consultation services, arranging and provision of loans, an interactive customer website featuring information in the field of consumer credit lending, and lending consultant services; Loan origination and preparation services; Arranging of loans; Financial loan consultation; Financial analysis, namely, analyzing data for use in debt collection | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for use in predictive analytics and enterprise decision management in the field of consumer credit lending; Providing temporary use of web-based software applications for predictive analytics and enterprise decision management services relating to the credit modeling and collections activities of others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others, to further enterprise decision management in the field of consumer lending and collections; Design and development of computer software for use in enterprise decision management, predictive analytics, credit decisioning, credit modeling and collections, excluding software used primarily for product data management and product lifecycle management and optimizing the product design, development, and manufacturing processes; Data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect consumer credit and financial data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of consumer financial services and personal loans; Design and development of software for the automation of financial verification processes; software as a service, namely, hosting software for use by others featuring credit decision modeling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CNU Online Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CNU Online Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENOVA BUSINESS SERVICES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |