USPTO serial 86652270
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Epstein
JEFFREY H. EPSTEIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ASSEMBLY LINE SYSTEMS, namely, A SERIES OF MACHINES FOR ASSEMBLING AIRCRAFT IN SUCCESSIVE STEPS, POSITIONERS, MACHINES, MACHINE TOOLS AND COMPONENT PARTS THEREFOR USED IN THE FABRICATION, MANUFACTURING, AND ASSEMBLY OF AIRCRAFT, AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS, AND AIRCRAFT BODIES, NAMELY, ASSEMBLY POSITIONING MACHINES; DRILLING, COUNTERSINKING, AND RIVETING MACHINES; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; AEROSPACE JIGS AND FIXTURES FOR CLAMPING AND HOLDING WORK PIECES TO BE ASSEMBLED | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1995 |
| 009 | Computer software for the automation of manufacturing, assembly and processing operations in the aerospace industry; electric control panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY, NAMELY, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, REFURBISHMENT, MODIFICATIONS AND RECONFIGURING COMPONENTS TO ACCOMMODATE DESIGN CHANGES AND TO ENHANCE PERFORMANCE TO AEROSPACE TOOLING, EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY | ACTIVE | May 31, 2013 |
| 039 | PHYSICAL RELOCATION SERVICES FOR THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY WHICH INCLUDES DISASSEMBLY, TRANSPORTATION, RIGGING, SET-UP-UP, INSPECTION AND RE-COMMISSIONING OF AEROSPACE TOOLING, EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2013 |
| 040 | MATERIAL PROCESSING AND TREATMENT AND CUSTOM FABRICATION FOR THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY, NAMELY, COMPOSITE FABRICATION,WELD FABRICATION, MANUFACTURING OF AIRCRAFT PARTS AND COMPONENTS; AND AIRCRAFT COMPONENT SUBASSEMBLY | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2014 |
| 042 | Engineering services in connection with the design, fabrication, and installation of integrated plant-floor assembly systems for the aerospace industry; planning and layout design services for manufacturing plants in the aerospace industry; Engineering services in connection with the design, manufacture, and installation of machines and systems for the automated assembly of aerospace structures, namely, automated systems for part-to-part assembly, positioning systems, circumferential drillers and fastening systems, numerically controlled drilling machines, laser indexing systems, automated laser alignment control systems, automated guided vehicles, mobile material handling systems, factory automation tools, assembly jigs and fixtures, and tooling systems; Engineering services in connection with the design and manufacture of a range of custom equipment, machines, automated and non-automated tooling, and finished materials used in assembly/alignment projects, large scale integration projects, and drilling projects for the aerospace industry; Engineering services in connection with the design and manufacture of aircraft precision machined parts, components, and subassemblies | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |