USPTO serial 86652357
USP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with USP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nanshan Dist, Shenzhan, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn L. Phillips
ROBYN L. PHILLIPS Workman Nydegger60 E South Temple Ste 1000Salt Lake City, UT 84111-1011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Calculating machines; Data processing apparatus; Computer memory devices; Computer memories; Computer hardware; Computer software; Computer programs, recorded; Computer operating programs, recorded; Computer software, recorded; Interfaces for computers; Downloadable computer programs; Downloadable computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Cloud computing; Computer system design; Computer software design and development; Rental of web servers; Server hosting; Electronic data storage; Computer rental and leasing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |