Drawing for PORTALDIRECT

USPTO serial 86652968

PORTALDIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5296861Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2017
Examiner
ROSENTHAL, AARON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with PORTALDIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK REILLY

PATRICK REILLY PATRICK T REILLY A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION604 MIDDLEFIELD DRIVEAPTOS, CA 95003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for enabling submission, transmission and delivery of digitized data, electronic documents and electronic reports related to real estate appraisals and mortgage calculations; providing software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for enabling submission, transmission and delivery of information relevant to real estate appraisals and mortgage application processing in compliance with standardized reporting formats as established by financial institutions and agencies in accordance with governmental regulations and lawsACTIVEAug 22, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2024NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2024C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 23, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 7, 2023E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 22, 2017SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2017CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 3, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 28, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 28, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 31, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 29, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance