USPTO serial 86653539
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Schwaebisch Hall, DE
Schwaebisch Hall, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J. Chinlund
GREGORY J CHINLUND MARSHALL GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP6300 WILLIS TOWER 233 SOUTH WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606-6471UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, recorded computer programs and downloadable computer programs used to record data, produce reports and analyze information relating to new product and business development; magnetic encoders; downloadable electronic publications, namely, catalogs, brochures and newsletters in the field of new product and business development; interfaces for computers; readers, namely, smart card readers, digital book readers; bar code readers; scanners | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services for others | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; updating of computer software and cloud based software; software consultancy; installation, rental and maintenance of software | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |