Drawing for DUROMAX

USPTO serial 86654574

DUROMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUROMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela B. Huff

Pamela B. Huff Schwegman Lundberg Woessner P.A.P.O. Box 2938Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Boar semenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 21, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 14, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 18, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 11, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance