USPTO serial 86655607
CUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seattle, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew E. Moersfelder
MATTHEW E. MOERSFELDER Davis Wright Tremaine Llp1201 3rd Ave Ste 2200Seattle, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | film and video production; film and video distribution; production of ongoing film series; providing an online website for the distribution of films and videos; applications for use on mobile devices and computers; entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the field of music; production of sound and music video recordings; a series of books and written articles in field of the intersection of popular culture and the human condition; design and development of computer game software and virtual reality software; computer game software; non-downloadable computer game software; entertainment services, namely, production of plays, performance art pieces, concerts, operas, and musicals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |