USPTO serial 86655669
VOLATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VOLATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for recording and monitoring cycling training and workout data and statistical analyses thereof, submitting and receiving information relating to cycling, remotely monitoring bicycle status and location, comparing performance with others, monitoring health information, obtaining weather information, and obtaining directions; computer hardware; bicycle helmets | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Bicycles; structural parts of bicycles; bicycle parts, namely, brakes, chains, handle bars, pedals, brake shoes, gears, wheels, rims, tires, forks, gear wheels, sprockets, derailleurs, kickstands, horns, frames, drive belts, brake cables, water bottle holders; racks for vehicles for bicycles; bicycle speedometers; bicycles embedded with speedometers and computers that display performance information, navigation information, smartphone notifications, weather information, and music information; bicycle accessories, namely, video display monitors, USB cables, USB charging ports, battery chargers with USB connection, GPS tracking devices, and cell phone holders, all of which are specially adapted for bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |