USPTO serial 86659045
BRENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOZAK, EVIN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Cruz
RICHARD L CRUZ DLA PIPER LLP US1650 MARKET STREETSUITE 4900PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7300Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CALCULATING, COLLECTING, COMPILING, ANALYZING, ESTIMATING, EVALUATING, AND REPORTING FINANCIAL PRICE INDICES AND RELATED INFORMATION FOR USE IN TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL TRANSACTION SETTLEMENT RATES, FINANCIAL MARGIN RATES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES; OPERATING A COMMODITIES AND COMMODITY DERIVATIVES EXCHANGE; PROVIDING FINANCIAL EXCHANGE SERVICES FOR TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING CURRENCIES, COMMODITIES, FUTURES, DERIVATIVES, SECURITIES, SHARES, STOCKS, OPTIONS AND BONDS; FINANCIAL CLEARING AND CLEARING HOUSE SERVICES, NAMELY, CLEARING FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING CURRENCIES, COMMODITIES, FUTURES, DERIVATIVES, SECURITIES, SHARES, STOCKS, OPTIONS AND BONDS; FINANCIAL INVESTMENT AND ADVISORY SERVICES; BROKERAGE SERVICES INVOLVING CURRENCIES, COMMODITIES, FUTURES, DERIVATIVES, SECURITIES, SHARES, STOCKS, OPTIONS AND BONDS; AND PROVIDING ALL OF THE AFORESAID SERVICES ON-LINE FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, THE INTERNET AND INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC MEDIA IN THE NATURE OF COMPUTER TERMINALS AND MOBILE COMMUNICATION DEVICES | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |