Drawing for THINKCAM

USPTO serial 86664627

THINKCAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THINKCAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane B. Melnick

DIANE B MELNICK POWLEY & GIBSON PCSUITE 202 304 HUDSON STNEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video camerasABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2018MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 2, 2018ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 2, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 2, 2018OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Dec 27, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance